Auditing animal welfare and making practical improvements in beef, pork, and sheep slaughter plants

2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare
The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, AL4 8AN UK

Animal Welfare 2012, 21(S2): 29-34
doi: 10.7120/096272812X13353700593400
ISSN 0962-7286

T.Grandin
Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1171


Abstract

A welfare audit that utilizes numerically scored, animal-based outcome measures has been used successfully by McDonald’s and other restaurant companies for over ten years. In 20lO, audit data from two restaurant companies indicated that all 30 of their North American plants rendered 95% or more of the cattle insensible with a single shot from a captive-bolt gun. Eight pork plants that used electrical stunning placed the tongs correctly on 99% or more of the pigs. All animals were insensible prior to hoisting. In 32 beef plants, the percentage of cattle vocalising in the stunning area was 5% or less. In 94% of the beef plants and 86% of the pork plants, none ofthe animals fell during handling. The worst falling score was 2% in two of the plants. High standards were attained by making simple changes. To improve welfare, plant managers did the following: improved stunner maintenance, installed non-slip floors in stun boxes and unloading ramps, and trained employees. To reduce balking and improve animal movement, the following modifications were made: illumination of dark race entrances, moving of lamps to eliminate reflections, reducing equipment noise, stopping employee yelling, installation of solid sides on races or shields to prevent animals from seeing activity outside the facility, and the elimination of air blowing in the faces of approaching animals. Employees were trained to use behavioural principles of animal handling such as the point of balance and the flight zone. The five numerically scored outcome measures in this audit are critical control points that can detect a variety of problems. They are: i) the percentage of animals stunned effectively with a single application of the stunner, ii) the percentage of animals falling during handling must be l% or less to pass, iii) the percentage of pigs or cattle vocalising (moo, bellow, squeal) in the stun box or while entering into the stun box must be 5% or less to pass (vocalisation scoring is not used for sheep); iv) the percentage of animals moved with an electric goad, and v) the percentage of animals rendered insensible before hoisting must be lOO% to pass an audit. An animal is scored as either silent or as a vocaliser and whether stunned correctly with a single application or not stunned correctly. The audit also contains a list of banned practices that will result in an automatic failure. To maintain improvements in handling, 23 plants have installed video cameras that are monitored by auditors viewing the footage over the internet. These external auditors perform numerical scoring at random times throughout the day. Video auditing over the internet is an important new tool for improving welfare.

Keywords: animal welfare, auditing, handling, slaughter, stunning, vocalisation


Click here to return to the Homepage for more information on animal behavior, welfare, and care.