From the Corral
Developing a Robust Systematic Approach for Humane Slaughter

by TEMPLE GRANDIN

Dept. of Animal Sciences
Colorado State University


Many people have asked what exactly is a robust systematic approach for humane slaughter. Lucy Anthenill, a DVMS inspector for FSIS/USDA gave a presentation at the NAMI Animal Care and Handling Conference of the items she looks for when she is assessing a plant for humane compliance. There are two basic requirements: 1) a robust systematic approach is similar to a HACCP plan and 2) the FSIS should have access to the records. FSIS regulations and directives do not specify that the plan must be written but both Dr. Anthenill and most plant managers would agree that a written plan is definitely preferred. Dr. Anthenill has visited plants where nobody could find the records for the robust systematic approach. This shows a lack of commitment that their plan is definitely not robust. People in the plant must actually be USING the materials to make the system robust. Each plant should have its own customized system, which is written to follow the actual procedures done in their plant. Copying wording verbatim from the FSIS/USDA website is not recommended. The website does contain much useful information and it can be accessed by typing the following title into Google. FSIS Compliance Guide to a Systematic Approach to Humane Handling of Livestock 2013. Other useful sources of information are www.grandin.com and the AVMA Humane Slaughter Guidelines 2016 edition.

Dr. Antenill outlined the components that a robust approach should have. I have put it into an outline that will make it easier for people who are first developing a program to understand. A robust systematic approach should have two major components which can be kept in separate binders for paper documents or separate sections of an online document. The two sections are your overall written plan and the second section would be your daily, weekly, and monthly inspections of your procedures, along with corrective actions for problems.

Section 1 (FSIS/USDA Access to this entire section). Written Plan for Robust Systematic Approach.
It is recommended that it should contain the following items.

1. Mission Statement of Goals (USDA/FSIS access) – few sentences, about overall goals.
2. Standard Operating Procedures (FSIS/USDA access) for YOUR plant.  An SOP should be written for the following areas.  Use plain simple language and each SOP may be a few sentences or a short paragraph.

3. Risk Assessment (FSIS/USDA Access) In your facility, outline possible problems that can occur in each one of the above areas.  Flow charts in the AVMA Humane Slaughter Guidelines 2016 edition are useful. State specific problems in your facility such as how you will prevent falls when the animals go around a sharp corner.  In a wet area where cartridges can get wet: How will you keep them dry? Only a few sentences are needed to each area.  Do not write a book on this.  Think PowerPoint bullet points with short paragraphs.

Section 2 – Internal Compliance Documents. (FSIS/USDA has access)

Records of Internal Audits (FSIS/USDA Access)
Includes internal audits using NAMI (AMI) guidelines.  If any part of the weekly NAMI audit is failed, there should be a recorded correction action.  Example – high vocalization score was improved by reducing pressure applied by a headholder.  

Records of Outside Audits and video footage (FSIS/USDA access is determined on a case-by-case basis by plant management) – Some examples are customer audits, third party remote video audits and archived video footage.


Click here to return to the Homepage for more information on animal behavior, welfare, and care.